Showing posts with label Rachael Dugas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rachael Dugas. Show all posts

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Interview with my Agent Rachael Dugas

So thrilled to present this interview with my wonderful agent Rachael Dugas of Talcott Notch Literary Services. Rachael has been an agent for about a year and a half and has already made three deals (yay, Rachael!) I sat her down for a virtual cup of coffee (wish it could have been real) and picked her brain with questions about the publishing industry and what she looks for in a novel. Enjoy!



Rachael, welcome to the Diving Secrets of the Writing Sisterhood!

Q: What genres do you love the most? What genres/themes you do NOT represent?

A: My pet genres are definitely YA, middle grade, and women’s fiction. These are some of my favorite genres as a reader, so I’m not really surprised they seem to be where I’ve gravitated as an agent. The next level down (genres I also love, but not with QUITE the same fervor) would be romance, historical fiction, and commercial adult fiction that has something really unique to make it stand out. In terms of non-fiction, I have a serious interest in cookbooks and performing arts-related material.

I do try to keep an open mind and consider everything that passes through my inbox, but I am really not terribly interested in sci-fi, fantasy, horror, crime, inspirational fiction, or non-fiction books in the business, health, financial arenas. We also do not work with picture books at our agency. Fortunately, between fellow Talcott Notch agents Gina Panettieri, Paula Munier, and Sara D’Emic and myself, we represent just about everything else!

Q: What type of Women’s Fiction (or any of its subgenres) appeals to you the most?

A: I absolutely adore any sort of quirky women’s fiction. I love a WF novel with a flawed, yet loveable, protagonist with a proclivity for getting herself into zany situations with very little effort. I like books centered around strong women with big personalities and opinions. That being said, they do need to be relatively believable characters that manage to be fresh and interesting, but still realistic. I do also love a sensitive, charming, and attractive love interest that compliments the heroine and brings out the best in her. I have also noticed I gravitate towards slightly sarcastic narrators/tones, though this is not necessarily a requirement. I have always loved reading Meg Cabot’s women’s fiction and have developed a recent love for Jill Mansell and her amazingly fun and quirky characters, so that should definitely give you a feel for the kinds of women’s fiction I adore.

Q: I recently read that Women’s Fiction is becoming harder to sell. Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?

A: That’s really interesting. As an agent just entering the field with in the last two years, the areas I’ve had the most success with so far are YA and romance, and I think that says a lot about what people, women especially, are reading right now. Romance sales have soared as e-readers have become ubiquitous, since readers no longer need to feel embarrassed about toting around the typically salacious covers. (Though what girl doesn’t enjoy seeing a good shirtless cowboy or highlander every now and then?) Though women’s fiction covers tend to be a lot tamer, if women are buying romance frequently, recommendations generated by sites like Amazon and proximity to romance titles on bookstore shelves should certainly point avid romance readers in the women’s fiction direction. Plus, there’s certainly a lot of crossover between the women’s fiction and romance—and if the readers are buying it, the publishers will continue to provide it. I also recently heard that the emerging genre “new adult” has been dubbed the new “chick lit”, so I think there’s a lot of speculation and potential misinformation floating around as people try to figure out the future of publishing and the “next big thing”. Whether or not it will come to fruition remains to be seen.

Q: Why do you think YA fiction has become so popular in the last few years? Do you think this trend will continue for much longer?

A: I think YA really started doing so amazingly well once grown-ups realized it was ok for them to read books for teens! With the mega-success of series like Harry Potter, Twilight, and The Hunger Games, I think that reading teen literature well into your adult years is no longer taboo. This has also been compounded by the fact that you don’t have to walk into the teen paranormal romance section of Barnes & Noble if you are self-conscious, but can order YA novels online or download them to your e-reader. The audience has really become much broader.

That’s not to say we can dismiss the intended audience as a factor for the success of the genre, of course! Teens, unlike younger children, have the means to buy books for themselves and experience much less parental intervention in regards to their reading material. Teens who love read devour books, seek them out themselves, and are willing to pay for them in a way that adults aren’t always. Also, teens eat, sleep, and breathe social media. If they like a book, they will tell their friends about it, whether it’s through tweets, Facebook, Goodreads, or old-fashioned word-of-mouth—and, as everybody knows, that’s not only the cheapest kind of publicity a book can get, but also the best!

Q: What are your top three authors of all time? What are your top three books?

A: Oh, gosh, you know there’s no way in heck I could ever answer this, right? That’s like asking me to pick which of my pets I love best! I will say that there are certain books that have always stayed with me in a meaningful way, even as my tastes have changed over time, and the top three on that list are The Bell Jar, Little Women, and the Harry Potter series. These are books I can (and have) read a million times over and find something new to appreciate in their dog-eared pages each time.

Q: What do you think is the ideal number of clients for an agent?

A: I think that’s really too personal a preference to make a blanket generalization about. (Though it’s an excellent question!) A list that is too vast will become unmanageable, but a tiny one isn’t great either. Some agents may set a literal number, but I know all of us here at Talcott Notch keep it pretty flexible. When you find an amazing book and you just know that you need to have it, you’re not going to pass it by because you don’t have room for it. Conversely, you wouldn’t take a mediocre book just to meet a magic quota. It’s definitely a quality game versus a quantity one.

Q: Please tell us about your editorial internship at Sourcebooks, Inc. What did you do there and how do you think this experience prepared you to become a literary agent? 

A: My editorial internship with Sourcebooks was wonderful. I worked in one of their smaller offices, where I assisted with their romance, women’s fiction, and Jane Austen-related titles, so I had a really hands-on and personal experience. I had the opportunity to write cover copy, to work with the systems they used to prepare manuscripts for production, and to research the market and competitive titles, just to name some of my more typical tasks. I really learned a lot about both the specific market and the industry in general. For a brand-new graduate with a love of books, an English degree, and almost no clue about what the publishing industry was like, it was the best thing that could have happened to me.

I found all the skills I acquired translated really well to agenting. Publishing is really a hands-on business. You can prepare your knowledge and your base skills (talking about books, market awareness, etc.) in school, but it’s that actual field experience that really counts. I would advise any college students who think they may want to go into publishing to start looking for internships now. It’s what will really make a difference when you get out in the real world and start applying for jobs.

Q: What are the most common problems you see in the manuscripts you receive?

A: If there’s one general problem with the manuscripts I read, it’s simply that I am not 100% convinced that they will have the ability to stand out in a severely crowded marketplace. If you get as far as a request for a full from an agent, you have probably written something that a) demonstrates a fairly accomplished level of writing prowess and b) is rooted in a concept that seems interesting, unique, and marketable. The problem is that many—if not most—manuscripts fail to marry the two, and that the combination is really the magic formula that makes me snatch up the phone and make an offer. It’s the most heartbreaking thing, as an agent, to pick up a manuscript that had an amazing start and find that it just doesn’t deliver in the remaining pages, but it happens more often than not. Also, sometimes a writer might achieve this elusive ideal, and I can see it from an objective standpoint, but I just don’t have that ardent desire to work with the particular novel—it’s just missing something for me. As we discuss all the time around here, a rejection doesn’t necessarily mean your novel isn’t well-executed or saleable—it just might mean that we don’t see it working for us or for our agency.

Q: Writers are often times frustrated with how difficult it is to get the attention of industry professionals. What do you think is the most effective method for a writer to get noticed: conferences, blogs, query letters, contests?

A: Unfortunately, I think so much of getting noticed is really just luck of the draw. I would say any chance to meet an editor/agent face-to-face will improve your odds slightly over more impersonal querying, but it’s certainly not a guarantee. If you only knew how many people we meet at conferences, pitch events, etc., you’d understand! I can tell you a surefire way to improve your chances when querying, though: know your market and always be specific. You’d be surprised how many queries I receive with a subject line of “Query”… and that’s it. While we strive to read every e-mail that comes through our inboxes, the sheer volume works against us and sometimes we have to pick and choose which e-mails to open and which to wait on. When I have several hundred e-mails in my inbox and I am picking through to find interesting-looking submissions, an e-mail titled “query” is not going to draw my attention. If you list your title, genre, and word count in the subject line, however, I can get a pretty good snap idea of what I’m about to read. It really helps! My other biggest piece of advice is to be honest and don’t try to paint yourself or your novel as something they’re not. Lies always come out in the end.

Q: How important do you think blogs are for fiction writers?

A: I think they are great! Readers love a place to connect with authors and to go beyond the pages of the books they love, teens especially. I think all fiction writers should create that space where their fans can get to know them, and I think it never hurts to start building it as early as possible.

Q: A lot of writers are nervous about the impending merger between Random House and Penguin. Do you think that if this happens, books will become harder to sell?

A: Books are already hard to sell. I don’t necessarily think a merger like this will make them any harder. It seems like the ramifications of this union will most strongly impact the upper corporate workings of these companies. Though, in an industry where much of the power is already centralized, it is totally understandable that writers, agents, and independent publishers are a little nervous.

Q: Do you think e-books present a threat to traditional books or they can happily co-exist?

A: I think people who love books—that is, the literal, physical act of holding a book in your hand, smelling the binding, and turning the pages—will always buy books. I am one of these strange, obsessive creatures myself and I refuse to switch over to an e-reader, both on principle and because, after crashing so many computers over the years, I have a slight distrust of technology’s ability to retain my most beloved data. Until we find ourselves in some dystopian-esc world where we’ve killed too many trees and paper is an uber-precious commodity, I feel reasonably certain that book people will continue to feed their hunger for the printed word by buying printed books.

Additionally, I don’t so much view them as two separate commodities as two different ways to format the same content. In a world where self-publishing is so accessible, e-books can get a bit of a bad rap, but many, many e-books are the electronic version of existent, printed books. They still went through the acquisition, development, and editorial process that their paper counterparts experienced. To me, it’s just like buying an mp3 versus a CD—it’s just a format choice.

Thank you, Rachael, for these informative answers!

Side note to all my fellow NiNoWriMos: Congratulations to all winners and non-winners! This was my second time participating, but my first time reaching the goal (50,029 words!) and I just wanted to say that I really enjoyed the sense of camaraderie and support provided by the writing community. Best luck to all of you with your new projects and keep on writing!


Sunday, August 19, 2012

The Girl Who Waited: My (Long) Road to Finding an Agent

Manuel Alvarez Bravo, El Ensueño (1931)
I usually don’t get too personal in this blog, but I thought this event was big enough to share with my fellow writers (drums, please): I HAVE AN AGENT!

Dying to know all the details? Not really? Well, I’m writing them anyway. :-)

In the beginning there was a man and a woman (ok, ok, I’ll spare you). Let’s start at around 2005. I had two babies (real human babies) and had been writing a variety of projects in both English and Spanish for contests, classes and myself: short stories, soap opera scripts (obviously NOT complete, but fully outlined) and half of a screenplay. There was one particular story that had taken root when I was still a graphic designer and illustrator (circa 1998-2000). It kept coming back to me in the form of a soap opera. Problem. I lived in the USA. There was not a big telenovela industry here (now there is), and I didn’t know how to reach Mexican or Colombian producers (two of the largest Spanish-speaking markets, which, I had heard, were more difficult to infiltrate than Russian mafia or the publishing industry in the US). I didn’t have any connections in those countries and I wasn’t planning a trip there any time soon. Besides, there were horror stories roaming the internet about plagiarism and writing apprentices who worked long hours for little pay in the hopes of getting their big chance one day with their own ideas. Not too appealing.

One day, my friend Malena (aka Sister Violante), shared with me some big news: she was writing a novel in English (gasp!) and she encouraged me to do the same. I hesitated. I had written short stories in English, and had lived in this country for several years, but I didn’t know if I had it in me to write a WHOLE novel in English.

I told her I didn’t think I could do it, but the writing bug stayed with me for a few days. The drive was stronger than my fear and so I evaluated my extensive telenovela outline/summary and decided right then and there that I would turn it into a novel! I rushed to the nearest bookstore and bought two books on the craft of writing a novel and devoured them in a week. I took a deep breath and, using my outline as a guide, I started writing a novel in English. Many moons passed until I finished the project but was terrified to share it with anybody. Somewhere between 2006 and 2007, I finally gathered the courage to share my writing with Malena, who was encouraging and patient with the sporadic pages that arrived in her inbox. Not sure of what direction to take (the thought of a critique group hadn’t occurred to me yet)  I attended my first writers conference and met a sweet editor who requested a partial of my novel. My first partial! I was so excited I sent the pages to her right away, certain that this would be “it.” In the meantime, a friend of mine introduced me to a couple of talented writers, Rosslyn and Barbara, and we formed a critique group.

Right away Rosslyn spotted POV problems and too many subplots (I talk about the problems of my first manuscript here.) Sure enough, the encouraging editor I had met at the conference wrote me back expressing the same concerns. With my critique partners’ help, I started rewriting the novel. I had to go through a killing-character spree for the novel to take form. I took an advanced novel course at my local community college, where I met two supportive and patient writers, Joycelyn and Don, who also helped me polish my novel. I finished my second rewrite and thought “now I’m ready.” I shared the novel with my husband, but he fell asleep over chapter four (literally!) Biting my hand to hold back my sobs, I wondered: Was my novel not as good as I thought, or was he simply tired?

In the meantime, Rosslyn read my entire second draft and found more problems. (Yes, I’m lucky to have her and no, you can’t have her!)  I redesigned my novel and rethought my main plot. Not a small task. Months later, the third draft was born. I continued taking courses, attending conferences and meeting new writers, among them my friends Suze and Sister Mary, who read the third draft and helped me polish it more. I won a blog contest and received a thoughtful critique from a respected editor who made me realize a crucial problem in my plot. (Thank you, Nick Harrison!) I met more editors and agents who read portions or my entire novel. They were encouraging (an editor even referred my novel to another editor in her publishing house), but none of them committed to my project. I kept hearing I was almost there. (Please bear with me, Dear Reader, I’m almost there with this story, too.) It felt like running a marathon with no trace of a finish line.

By now, a new idea was born in my mind: a historical novel set in the Galapagos Islands (my obsession). I researched. I outlined. I started writing. I stopped querying my first novel. Two big things happened next: my friends and I started the Sisterhood blog and  my second novel won an international writing contest.

The Sisters (including the brilliant Stephanie) kept reading and helping me polishing my second novel (no extensive rewrites on this one. I had learned something!) And in December 2011, I entered the Baker’s Dozen Agent Auction sponsored by Authoress at Miss Snark’s First Victim blog. Two agents ‘fought’ for my novel. The feeling was exhilarating. And so I decided to start querying the project after both agents requested my full. After my earlier and failed querying experience, I realized two things:
  1. I was going to have to query more aggressively than the first time (meaning more agents in a shorter amount of time).
  2. I had to query in a smarter way (meaning targeting agents a little better by doing more research than the first time). And so I bought a Premium Membership at Query Tracker.
I developed a plan of action: I would query an agent a day (except during trips or family visits). And if I got a pass, I was obligated to query someone else the same day. Plus (and this was a big change from my first querying experience) unless an agency specified against it, I would query other agents at the same agency after a few months of being ignored or rejected.

I started getting requests (mostly fulls, but a few partials as well). I started getting rejections (several) but on my birthday, I received the gift of a partial request. I should have known this apparently casual event meant something. A couple of days later, said agent upgraded the request to a full.

I sent the material and kept querying, went to a writers conference and met a couple more agents who requested material. I sent them the novel and waited. And waited. And waited. Until this summer.

I went on a trip to Spain and then to Ecuador to visit my family. On July 23rd, I casually checked my Spam folder, ready to clear it, when the name of the agent who had requested on my birthday popped up.

The agent-in-question was brief. She said she had finished reading my novel and wanted to offer representation. I was confused. This was not the kind of letter I was expecting. (Could this be a mistake? Was this letter meant for someone else?) I entered a stage of numbness/confusion/anxiety. The agent and I corresponded a little bit and agreed to talk in a couple of days. That evening and the next morning, I notified the ten agents who had my novel and a few more whom I had queried. The next two days, my inbox filled up with correspondence from agents: nine requested a week to read while three passed on the project. (A few others were forever silent.) It was a writer’s dream come true! (Incredible the power those three little words “offer of representation” have.)

I spoke to the offering agent and was delighted with our conversation. She was so enthusiastic about my novel and my writing that I thought I was dreaming. Four days later, a second agent made an offer and scheduled a conference call with me.

I spoke to the second agent and her boss and they impressed me with their projection for my novel and their experience. I was in trouble. I liked them, too!  I thought a lot and talked to my close friends/family members about my offers when a third offer came. Another call and more doubts. How was I going to pick (Did I have to? Couldn’t I keep all of them?)

I sat down and thought hard. The first agent had an enthusiasm that was contagious (she even got me excited about my novel again!) and we shared the same vision (editorially speaking). Plus she expressed an interest in my first novel and her track record was good. Also, when I went through her list, I found that I was drawn to the books she had represented and sold. It was a perfect match! So without further ado, I’m thrilled to introduce my brand new agent: Rachael Dugas with Talcott Notch Literary Services!

For those writers who are feeling a little discouraged and depressed, check out my querying statistics so you can see that THERE IS HOPE for you, too!

Second novel:

Queries sent: 119
Requests (before offer): 17
Requests (after offer): 3
Total requests: 20
Rejections to queries: 74
Rejections to submissions: 15
No responses to queries: 25
No responses to submissions: 2
Offers: 3
Agent: 1

Time querying second novel: Almost 8 months

First novel:

Queries sent: 50
Requests (including conferences): 12
Rejections: 31
Rejections to submissions: 10
No responses to queries: 19
No responses to submissions: 2

Time querying first novel (not including conferences in 07 and 08): 1 year, 8 months