Winner of the 1975 Pulitzer Prize |
The melancholic Longstreet |
Robert E. Lee, however, does not come across well here. What image I had of him was of a tragic hero: wonderful leader, terrible cause. But by the time Gettysburg came around, Lee had been undone by success: he thought he couldn't lose, so he stopped strategizing. As my son said, while watching the Ken Burns documentary on the war, "Oh! I know what happened to him! Hubris." Lee's men loved him, but he was no tactician in Gettysburg and Pickett's charge led thousands to needless deaths. I mean, "needless" even in the context of war. In contrast, Longstreet seems both brilliant and practical, though he didn't inspire the same sort of love. I felt depressed after each Longstreet section, though — he was always hurtling into doom, and he knew it. He was gloomy anyway, due to the death of three of his children, and now he found himself on the wrong side of an unwinnable war. Life for Longstreet just sucks.
Bookish Chamberlain: before the war, he was a college professor |
Some readers come away feeling Shaara was pro-war, some that he was anti-war. But The Killer Angels isn't so neatly categorized. Shaara seems to feel the Civil War was a glorious folly: the bloody bits are there, but mostly the war is romanticized; at the same time, Shaara seems to think it was awful and pointless. I wonder about that juxtaposition. Maybe that's the way a lot of men feel about war? (Women seem less conflicted.)
New estimates put Civil War deaths at 750,000 |
My daughter will be studying the Civil War this year in AP US History, and I'm going to recommend she read this book before that unit. It may just be Gettysburg, but it's a good human-scale intro to the war, and it certainly piqued my interest in that time period: we are now working our way through the Ken Burns documentary, and I've added the new, acclaimed Civil-War-era history Ecstatic Nation to my to-read bookshelf. I would highly recommend this book, even to those bored by history. Especially to those bored by history.
Edition note: The audiobook narration by Stephen Hoye was excellent. He's a slow reader and he practically sings the more lyrical parts, but that seems appropriate. He helped me get into the story — not that I needed much prodding. It's a page turner.
* I write for this blog and also for my own, Words Incorporated. I reviewed separate books for each.
Check out the other Cephalopod Reviews here:
Awesome. I recently studied this time period in depth, and all I have to say is: fascinating. History is so amazing.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it? I love starting with historical fiction: it's so much juicier than a dry history book. After I get the impressionistic picture, I can sit through a more factual retelling.
DeleteThanks for stopping by!
Now that I am older I can't read these kinds of books any more. The sorrow of all that death sometimes just can't be borne.
ReplyDeleteI hear you. After reading this one and then the nonfiction book "Sex & War" (which I review on my Words Inc. blog) I am DONE. I need something vigorously fluffy and cuddly to read next. Hope I'll find something on the blog hop!
DeleteThere is a conflict embedded into the idea of war, isn't there? Dying for "what is right" will always have a romanticism about it. But dying all by itself is bloody awful. The last book I read that was a Civil War novel was very good: "March" by Geraldine Brooks. This one sounds good too.
ReplyDelete"Dying for 'what is right' will always have a romanticism about it. But dying all by itself is bloody awful." That is mighty pithy, Kerry! Well stated.
DeleteI had forgotten that "March" was set during the Civil War. Or maybe I never knew. I really like Brooks, and I haven't read that one. After I recover from August's war trauma (the book kind, anyway) I'll have to read that one.
I write about civil war in my novels, so this book would actually make a great resource for me. I'm going to check it out. :)
ReplyDeleteDefinitely a great resource! You've probably already discovered this, but when I was researching surgical methods of the 19th century, I found records of battlefield surgery during the war. Grim and fascinating reading. There must be loads of other stuff too: newspapers, wedding announcements, letters, all scanned in and available to the public, for free.
DeleteI always love reading historical novels well written. This one sounds amazing. Great review. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome! If you read it, stop by to let me know what you thought.
DeleteI love learning about history through novels.... generally speaking, learning is best when it doesn't feel like learning!
ReplyDeleteI agree! I wish schools would realize this and work historical fiction into their history classes.
DeleteThanks for this review. I like the idea of a focused history that allows so much insight into the characters of the key men. I also like that the author reflects all the gray areas of war - it's rarely fully right or fully wrong.
ReplyDeleteShaara had to do a lot of imaginative reconstruction of characters, but he really did his research.
DeleteI have a student - 5th grade - who's seriously into the Civil War. Too much for a kid, do you think?
ReplyDeleteWell, I listened to Slate magazine's "Audio Book Club" discussion of this book, and Emily Bazelon said her dad read it to her as a child, and was VERY excited to read it to his grandchildren when they were born. I think they were younger than 5th grade.
DeleteI think it depends on the kid: the violence is less than in The Hunger Games (read by my son's entire 5th grade class, pretty much) but the time spent in the men's heads might not hold a kid's attention. Then again, if he/she is super into that war, and knows who these characters are ...
Here's a link to the Slate podcast: http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_audio_book_club/2011/05/the_audio_book_club_on_the_killer_angels.html
DeleteMy son is a "picky" fiction reader (he actually loves those dry history books :)) so I may give this one a try.
DeleteI'm in awe, Sister Steph, at how much and widely you read!
Excellent. I'll pass the recommendation on. For all I know, he's already read it!
DeleteThis book sounds really interesting. I know nothing about most of American history, so it might be a good book to add to my TBR. :)
ReplyDeleteIt's a great introduction! Very gripping. Makes me want to reread Cold Mountain.
DeleteLove, love, love the Civil War and anything about it! I've not read The Killer Angels (and now I'm wondering why since it's The Classic Novel of the Civil War!), but you can bet I will be. It's funny that you bring up Ken Burns, because my post next week will be about documentaries and he's my absolute favorite! His Civil War documentary (which I watched back in high school) was one of the main things that made me fall in love with history and historical fiction. This was a great pick for this week!
ReplyDeleteI can't wait to hear what you have to say about the Ken Burns doc! We all really enjoyed it. My husband grew up right near Gettysburg and is still pretty obsessed with all things Civil War. Like you, he'd seen the Burns doc but never read the Killer Angels — maybe fiction seemed a little too "light" a treatment for a war, or something. But after I finished it, his interest was piqued, and he blasted through it last week. Loved it, too!
DeleteA fascinating and interesting lesson in history. Thanks so much.
ReplyDeleteNas
Okay, can I just say Boy knows how to shoot it straight? (I was trying to remember his nickname that is so far from his name you can't trace it back to use here and I forgot it. Boo.)
ReplyDeleteGotta love a kid who can throw around his literary devices with such panache.
I had never heard of this book, but I am now definitely going to read it. Thank you.
ReplyDelete